(09-17-2016, 05:49 PM)DalaGStanator Wrote: Usually, when we say "coach" here, we mean a railway passenger carriage, not a bus. Not to mention, neither of the rolling stock for the 'Animal Express' are such "coaches". For some reason, it looks as if the battery for the bus is where the passengers would be (in the second shot).
If I remember correctly, the Donkey Kong look-alike moves its arms up and down while in motion. Is that correct?
Maybe in your country you call a coach a bus, but here in ENGLAND where ENGLISH comes from we call a COACH a COACH and an OMNIBUS a BUS they are two totally different things. So please before correcting someone get your facts right.
As for a train COACH the correct term collectively is ROLLING STOCK and they are usually referred to as CARS when discussed individually/generically which also happens to be what the ENGLISH call an AUTOMOBILE.
If you wish to distinguish individual train CARS they will refer to them as PASSENGER CARS/CARRIAGES or WAGONS depending upon their type they would never call them a COACH as a COACH is typically a single decked OMNIBUS.
Bottom line here is if you want to comment on someone's post try being constructive rather than keep criticising people, we all come from all over the world and each have different terms for different things, we don't need some polictical correctness police to keep chipping in with childish petty comments like yours.
And as for the 'Gorilla' WAGON, that does not move its arms 'up and down' when in motion it claps its hands as I already stated.
THANK YOU...