The "stunt trains" controversy.

13 Replies, 17760 Views

(03-03-2016, 01:10 AM)Muddy Poppins Wrote: They are crap!!
Fisher Price "redesigned" them not because they were flawed, but strictly for profit!! It is an inferior hunk of garbage, as is the idea of a "stunt train"... They are all hype and flash, but without a solid foundation of substance. The old models were far superior to the Revolutions in every way, as were the sets, and overall concept of their uses and playability. I have watched countless demos of climbing gimmicky sets that fail 25% of the time with these junky little engines, and nearly 100% of the time with the old versions, sending them crashing to the ground!! One of the main reasons I chose the trackmaster line was its reliability and durability, but not as a reason to purposely abuse them..these new sets and whole line conceptually is just a lot of smoke being blown back up your own smokestacks!!! Greed is why they exist. Period.

I'm going to sound like a broken record here (and might unintentionally sound like I'm trying to start an argument) but isn't the point of a company to make a profit? It's not greed, it's just good business. *gets shot*
While I know that the new trains are nowhere near as good as the old ones, I wouldn't call them bad. They're lower quality but are still somewhat reasonably good build quality from what I can tell

Messages In This Thread
RE: The "stunt trains" controversy. - by Miksolo - 03-03-2016, 12:41 AM
RE: The "stunt trains" controversy. - by DarthShaymin14 - 03-03-2016, 01:37 AM
RE: The "stunt trains" controversy. - by jdogman - 03-03-2016, 02:06 AM
RE: The "stunt trains" controversy. - by Ucwepn - 03-04-2016, 03:52 AM
RE: The "stunt trains" controversy. - by Super - 03-04-2016, 04:29 AM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)